Fast Neutron Reactor Overview - World Nuclear Association - April 2010 .pdf
BN-800 update page

< Replacing this.
With this. >
(Right) Rosatom BN-800 nuclear boiler.
Part 3
Part 5

Note: The author, an amateur classical music recording engineer, has been using Sovtek high performance tubes in his high-end amplifiers for years. So getting a Russian built reactor doesn't seem an impossibly far reach for 2010.
Part 1:
Why the author thinks the BN-800 has the "Right Stuff" to replace
coal.
The author thinks engineers who have
spent their careers around boilers and turbines like these will agree that,
while this is not a perfect fit,
it is certainly "Good Enough." (If
you have candidate boiler and can get the government to expense the engineering
costs of an emissions feasibility study,
the author knows of a utility engineering firm that's looking for work.)
Replacing coal boilers with nuclear boilers OF THIS TYPE.
(The more advanced
high temperature
fast-neutron reactors are far better suited for coal replacement applications than
are the older, far less uranium efficient,
and cooler common slow neutron reactors. The BN-800 mentioned here is a
commercial product. Earlier versions go back to
1973.)
Steam compatibilities. Using the world's largest supersized coal plant, Taichung, as a very typical example. Rosatom's BN-800 880MWe high temperature nuclear boiler and Taichung's GE 550 MWe turbine are a very close fit. At 880 MWe, the reactor can provide much more steam than the 550 MWe turbine can use. The turbine is built for 2,524psi/1,000°F steam while the OEM BN-800 delivers 2,000psi/910°F steam. Mass flow would be about 3,187,000 pounds of water per hour.
The BN-800 has liquid-to-liquid steam generators as opposed to the much longer gas-to-liquid boiler tubes of a coal burning boiler.
Can the BN-800 make the 2,524 psia steam needed to drive the 550 MWe GE turbine to full power? Yes, as long as the steam generators are designed for the extra 524 psi pressure, but you may not want to. Saturated steam temperature for 2,524 psi is 669°F so making pressure isn't a problem. This does mean the superheat and reheat would be 910
S
(Interesting aside: "The mPower is designed
so as to produce steam with +50 °F (10 °C) of superheat, allowing the steam
turbogenerator to run in the superheated regime, and avoid the issue of having
to deal with low-quality, efficiency-reducing moist steam of the saturated
regime, as non-B&W light water reactors (such as the Westinghouse AP1000 and the
General Electric ABWR and ESBWR) are well known for producing large quantities
of.") - - [?] exact quote from Wikipedia's mPower
Another aspect is what to do with all that extra steam power that
will be available on sites that have coal units smaller than 880 MWe? A
second turbine gallery with new small low-cost coal steam turbine-generators
comes to mind. The second gallery could also be located in another
unneeded portion of the coal yard. Dual set of heat exchanger-steam
generators. The fact that the reactor has a common liquid coolant for both
sets means the control rod system doesn't need to be any different.
Come to think of it, you could bus the secondary coolant into
multiple steam generators and run an entire older coal plant with a half-dozen
turbines, perhaps adding a couple of new ones, off a single BN-800.
Who is Rosatom?
(Below) BN-600 and BN-800 comparison.
